GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

USKnownHostvsLumen TechnologiesUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

KnownHost
WPTR ScoreWinner526 ms
Rank#62
TTFB64ms
Time to 1MB164ms
Score526
LCP464ms
FCP264ms
Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies

View Details →
WPTR Score990 ms
Rank#105
TTFB274ms
Time to 1MB106ms
Score990
LCP674ms
FCP474ms

Our Verdict

KnownHost wins with 64ms TTFB (vs Lumen Technologies's 274ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKnownHostLumen TechnologiesWinner
DNS Lookup34ms5msLumen Technologies
TCP Connection47ms45msLumen Technologies
TLS Handshake23ms17msLumen Technologies
Server Processing28ms669msKnownHost
Total TTFB132ms736msKnownHost

Technology & Security Features

KnownHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size139.8 KB

Lumen Technologies

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size307.3 KB
2/3
KnownHost Security Features
1/3
Lumen Technologies Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.