GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

USKnownHostvsRenderUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

KnownHost
WPTR ScoreWinner526 ms
Rank#62
TTFB64ms
Time to 1MB164ms
Score526
LCP464ms
FCP264ms
Render
WPTR Score830 ms
Rank#223
TTFB295ms
Time to 1MB235ms
Score830
LCP695ms
FCP495ms

Our Verdict

KnownHost wins with 64ms TTFB (vs Render's 295ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKnownHostRenderWinner
DNS Lookup34ms4msRender
TCP Connection47ms39msRender
TLS Handshake23ms10msRender
Server Processing28ms213msKnownHost
Total TTFB132ms266msKnownHost

Technology & Security Features

KnownHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size139.8 KB

Render

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size254.7 KB
2/3
KnownHost Security Features
2/3
Render Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.