GitHub|Since 2007

DElima-cityvsLinevastDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1034 ms
Rank#277
TTFB157ms
Time to 1MB340ms
Score1034
LCP557ms
FCP357ms
WPTR Score1389 ms
Rank#426
TTFB214ms
Time to 1MB480ms
Score1389
LCP614ms
FCP414ms

Our Verdict

lima-city wins with 157ms TTFB (vs Linevast's 214ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phaselima-cityLinevastWinner
DNS Lookup8ms25mslima-city
TCP Connection53ms87mslima-city
TLS Handshake55ms66mslima-city
Server Processing102ms59msLinevast
Total TTFB218ms237mslima-city

Technology & Security Features

lima-city

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size34.3 KB

Linevast

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size17.3 KB
0/3
lima-city Security Features
2/3
Linevast Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.