GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DELinevastvsnoez.deDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Linevast
WPTR Score1389 ms
Rank#426
TTFB214ms
Time to 1MB480ms
Score1389
LCP614ms
FCP414ms
noez.de
WPTR ScoreWinner433 ms
Rank#80
TTFB175ms
Time to 1MB130ms
Score433
LCP575ms
FCP375ms

Our Verdict

noez.de wins with 175ms TTFB (vs Linevast's 214ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLinevastnoez.deWinner
DNS Lookup25ms1msnoez.de
TCP Connection87ms14msnoez.de
TLS Handshake66ms17msnoez.de
Server Processing59ms89msLinevast
Total TTFB237ms121msnoez.de

Technology & Security Features

Linevast

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size17.3 KB

noez.de

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size99.3 KB
2/3
Linevast Security Features
3/3
noez.de Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.