GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DELinevastvsq.beyondDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Linevast
WPTR Score1389 ms
Rank#426
TTFB214ms
Time to 1MB480ms
Score1389
LCP614ms
FCP414ms
q.beyond
WPTR ScoreWinner987 ms
Rank#206
TTFB397ms
Time to 1MB175ms
Score987
LCP797ms
FCP597ms

Our Verdict

Linevast wins with 214ms TTFB (vs q.beyond's 397ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLinevastq.beyondWinner
DNS Lookup25ms268msLinevast
TCP Connection87ms101msLinevast
TLS Handshake66ms50msq.beyond
Server Processing59ms148msLinevast
Total TTFB237ms567msLinevast

Technology & Security Features

Linevast

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size17.3 KB

q.beyond

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size73.0 KB
2/3
Linevast Security Features
0/3
q.beyond Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.