GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DELinevastvsRoot360DE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Linevast
WPTR Score1389 ms
Rank#426
TTFB214ms
Time to 1MB480ms
Score1389
LCP614ms
FCP414ms
Root360
WPTR ScoreWinner754 ms
Rank#460
TTFB887ms
Time to 1MB253ms
Score754
LCP1287ms
FCP1087ms

Our Verdict

Linevast wins with 214ms TTFB (vs Root360's 887ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLinevastRoot360Winner
DNS Lookup25ms2msRoot360
TCP Connection87ms39msRoot360
TLS Handshake66ms42msRoot360
Server Processing59ms64msLinevast
Total TTFB237ms147msLinevast

Technology & Security Features

Linevast

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size17.3 KB

Root360

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size328.0 KB
2/3
Linevast Security Features
1/3
Root360 Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.