GitHub|Since 2007

FRLinktvsNBS SystemFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score2327 ms
Rank#534
TTFB248ms
Time to 1MB720ms
Score2327
LCP648ms
FCP448ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1002 ms
Rank#244
TTFB320ms
Time to 1MB251ms
Score1002
LCP720ms
FCP520ms

Our Verdict

Linkt wins with 248ms TTFB (vs NBS System's 320ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLinktNBS SystemWinner
DNS Lookup247ms100msNBS System
TCP Connection182ms149msNBS System
TLS Handshake78ms57msNBS System
Server Processing92ms94msLinkt
Total TTFB599ms400msLinkt

Technology & Security Features

Linkt

Server/CDNnginx/1.14.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.1 KB

NBS System

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size642.6 KB
0/3
Linkt Security Features
1/3
NBS System Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.