GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRLinktvsOodriveFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Linkt
WPTR Score2327 ms
Rank#534
TTFB248ms
Time to 1MB720ms
Score2327
LCP648ms
FCP448ms
Oodrive
WPTR ScoreWinner1009 ms
Rank#156
TTFB173ms
Time to 1MB221ms
Score1009
LCP573ms
FCP373ms

Our Verdict

Oodrive wins with 173ms TTFB (vs Linkt's 248ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLinktOodriveWinner
DNS Lookup247ms316msLinkt
TCP Connection182ms47msOodrive
TLS Handshake78ms49msOodrive
Server Processing92ms67msOodrive
Total TTFB599ms479msOodrive

Technology & Security Features

Linkt

Server/CDNnginx/1.14.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.1 KB

Oodrive

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1270.3 KB
0/3
Linkt Security Features
1/3
Oodrive Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.