LinodevsRegister.com
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Linode
View Details →
Register.com
View Details →Our Verdict
Linode wins with 170ms TTFB (vs Register.com's 178ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Linode | Register.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 70ms | 7ms | Register.com |
| TCP Connection | 36ms | 8ms | Register.com |
| TLS Handshake | 38ms | 12ms | Register.com |
| Server Processing | 83ms | 162ms | Linode |
| Total TTFB | 227ms | 189ms | Linode |
Technology & Security Features
Linode
Register.com
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.