Long View SystemsvsSoftchoice
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026
Long View Systems
View Details →Softchoice
View Details →Our Verdict
Long View Systems wins with 548ms TTFB (vs Softchoice's 688ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Long View Systems | Softchoice | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 86ms | 163ms | Long View Systems |
| TCP Connection | 106ms | 49ms | Softchoice |
| TLS Handshake | 10ms | 92ms | Long View Systems |
| Server Processing | 429ms | 543ms | Long View Systems |
| Total TTFB | 631ms | 847ms | Long View Systems |
Technology & Security Features
Long View Systems
Softchoice
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.