GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DEmanituvsnoez.deDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

manitu
WPTR Score1150 ms
Rank#272
TTFB180ms
Time to 1MB327ms
Score1150
LCP580ms
FCP380ms
noez.de
WPTR ScoreWinner433 ms
Rank#80
TTFB175ms
Time to 1MB130ms
Score433
LCP575ms
FCP375ms

Our Verdict

noez.de wins with 175ms TTFB (vs manitu's 180ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phasemanitunoez.deWinner
DNS Lookup202ms1msnoez.de
TCP Connection46ms14msnoez.de
TLS Handshake52ms17msnoez.de
Server Processing65ms89msmanitu
Total TTFB365ms121msnoez.de

Technology & Security Features

manitu

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size36.3 KB

noez.de

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size99.3 KB
1/3
manitu Security Features
3/3
noez.de Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.