GitHub|Since 2007

ruMasterhostvsVDSinaru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1426 ms
Rank#396
TTFB595ms
Time to 1MB295ms
Score1426
LCP995ms
FCP795ms
WPTR Score1964 ms
Rank#263
TTFB334ms
Time to 1MB255ms
Score1964
LCP734ms
FCP534ms

Our Verdict

VDSina wins with 334ms TTFB (vs Masterhost's 595ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMasterhostVDSinaWinner
DNS Lookup70ms177msMasterhost
TCP Connection103ms202msMasterhost
TLS Handshake81ms159msMasterhost
Server Processing464ms814msMasterhost
Total TTFB718ms1352msVDSina

Technology & Security Features

Masterhost

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size51.4 KB

VDSina

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size39.3 KB
0/3
Masterhost Security Features
1/3
VDSina Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.