maxclustervsMc-Host24
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

maxcluster
View Details →
Mc-Host24
View Details →Our Verdict
Mc-Host24 wins with 119ms TTFB (vs maxcluster's 195ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | maxcluster | Mc-Host24 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 173ms | 27ms | Mc-Host24 |
| TCP Connection | 46ms | 14ms | Mc-Host24 |
| TLS Handshake | 49ms | 18ms | Mc-Host24 |
| Server Processing | 84ms | 166ms | maxcluster |
| Total TTFB | 352ms | 225ms | Mc-Host24 |
Technology & Security Features
maxcluster
Mc-Host24
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.