Mc-Host24vsVariomedia
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Mc-Host24
View Details →
Variomedia
View Details →Our Verdict
Mc-Host24 wins with 119ms TTFB (vs Variomedia's 387ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Mc-Host24 | Variomedia | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 27ms | 45ms | Mc-Host24 |
| TCP Connection | 14ms | 71ms | Mc-Host24 |
| TLS Handshake | 18ms | 82ms | Mc-Host24 |
| Server Processing | 166ms | 241ms | Mc-Host24 |
| Total TTFB | 225ms | 439ms | Mc-Host24 |
Technology & Security Features
Mc-Host24
Variomedia
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.