GitHub|Since 2007

DEMittwaldvsProfihostDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1700 ms
Rank#496
TTFB204ms
Time to 1MB604ms
Score1700
LCP604ms
FCP404ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1091 ms
Rank#288
TTFB293ms
Time to 1MB291ms
Score1091
LCP693ms
FCP493ms

Our Verdict

Mittwald wins with 204ms TTFB (vs Profihost's 293ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMittwaldProfihostWinner
DNS Lookup49ms132msMittwald
TCP Connection57ms57msTie
TLS Handshake58ms60msMittwald
Server Processing86ms144msMittwald
Total TTFB250ms393msMittwald

Technology & Security Features

Mittwald

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size154.3 KB

Profihost

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size268.8 KB
1/3
Mittwald Security Features
1/3
Profihost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.