GitHub|Since 2007

USMochaHostvsNetlifyUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner361 ms
Rank#34
TTFB109ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score361
LCP509ms
FCP309ms
WPTR Score1344 ms
Rank#391
TTFB178ms
Time to 1MB464ms
Score1344
LCP578ms
FCP378ms

Our Verdict

MochaHost wins with 109ms TTFB (vs Netlify's 178ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMochaHostNetlifyWinner
DNS Lookup6ms51msMochaHost
TCP Connection11ms31msMochaHost
TLS Handshake16ms78msMochaHost
Server Processing45ms70msMochaHost
Total TTFB78ms230msMochaHost

Technology & Security Features

MochaHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size457.0 KB

Netlify

Server/CDNNetlify
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size223.8 KB
2/3
MochaHost Security Features
2/3
Netlify Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.