GitHub|Since 2007

USName.comvsTMDHostingUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner341 ms
Rank#26
TTFB68ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score341
LCP468ms
FCP268ms
WPTR Score1613 ms
Rank#10
TTFB54ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score1613
LCP454ms
FCP254ms

Our Verdict

TMDHosting wins with 54ms TTFB (vs Name.com's 68ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseName.comTMDHostingWinner
DNS Lookup7ms7msTie
TCP Connection10ms12msName.com
TLS Handshake10ms16msName.com
Server Processing16ms1300msName.com
Total TTFB43ms1335msTMDHosting

Technology & Security Features

Name.com

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size200.7 KB

TMDHosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size457.0 KB
2/3
Name.com Security Features
1/3
TMDHosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.