GitHub|Since 2007

FRNameshieldvsOVHcloudFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score2731 ms
Rank#537
TTFB844ms
Time to 1MB390ms
Score2731
LCP1244ms
FCP1044ms
WPTR ScoreWinner574 ms
Rank#310
TTFB702ms
Time to 1MB152ms
Score574
LCP1102ms
FCP902ms

Our Verdict

OVHcloud wins with 702ms TTFB (vs Nameshield's 844ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNameshieldOVHcloudWinner
DNS Lookup83ms5msOVHcloud
TCP Connection62ms65msNameshield
TLS Handshake74ms73msOVHcloud
Server Processing1576ms66msOVHcloud
Total TTFB1795ms209msOVHcloud

Technology & Security Features

Nameshield

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size218.3 KB

OVHcloud

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size590.5 KB
1/3
Nameshield Security Features
1/3
OVHcloud Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.