GitHub|Since 2007

FRNetimvsSafeBrandsFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score3608 ms
Rank#777
TTFB2569ms
Time to 1MB748ms
Score3608
LCP2969ms
FCP2769ms
WPTR ScoreWinner749 ms
Rank#165
TTFB277ms
Time to 1MB188ms
Score749
LCP677ms
FCP477ms

Our Verdict

SafeBrands wins with 277ms TTFB (vs Netim's 2569ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetimSafeBrandsWinner
DNS Lookup132ms111msSafeBrands
TCP Connection11ms8msSafeBrands
TLS Handshake17ms14msSafeBrands
Server Processing1653ms165msSafeBrands
Total TTFB1813ms298msSafeBrands

Technology & Security Features

Netim

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size106.6 KB

SafeBrands

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size140.2 KB
3/3
Netim Security Features
0/3
SafeBrands Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.