GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRNetimvsSigmaFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Netim
WPTR Score3608 ms
Rank#777
TTFB2569ms
Time to 1MB748ms
Score3608
LCP2969ms
FCP2769ms
Sigma
WPTR ScoreWinner2634 ms
Rank#567
TTFB313ms
Time to 1MB767ms
Score2634
LCP713ms
FCP513ms

Our Verdict

Sigma wins with 313ms TTFB (vs Netim's 2569ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetimSigmaWinner
DNS Lookup132ms509msNetim
TCP Connection11ms112msNetim
TLS Handshake17ms58msNetim
Server Processing1653ms114msSigma
Total TTFB1813ms793msSigma

Technology & Security Features

Netim

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size106.6 KB

Sigma

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size120.8 KB
3/3
Netim Security Features
1/3
Sigma Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.