RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)vsSpaceWeb
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)
View Details →
SpaceWeb
View Details →Our Verdict
RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) wins with 230ms TTFB (vs SpaceWeb's 1020ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) | SpaceWeb | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 83ms | 151ms | RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) |
| TCP Connection | 157ms | 71ms | SpaceWeb |
| TLS Handshake | 76ms | 144ms | RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) |
| Server Processing | 70ms | 1111ms | RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) |
| Total TTFB | 386ms | 1477ms | RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) |
Technology & Security Features
RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)
SpaceWeb
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.