NOCIXvsAutomattic (WordPress.com)
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

NOCIX
View Details →
Automattic (WordPress.com)
View Details →Our Verdict
NOCIX wins with 61ms TTFB (vs Automattic (WordPress.com)'s 204ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | NOCIX | Automattic (WordPress.com) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 61ms | 4ms | Automattic (WordPress.com) |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 32ms | NOCIX |
| TLS Handshake | 23ms | 32ms | NOCIX |
| Server Processing | 30ms | 136ms | NOCIX |
| Total TTFB | 130ms | 204ms | NOCIX |
Technology & Security Features
NOCIX
Automattic (WordPress.com)
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.