Noris NetworkvsPixel X
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Noris Network
View Details →Pixel X
View Details →Our Verdict
Pixel X wins with 130ms TTFB (vs Noris Network's 160ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Noris Network | Pixel X | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 54ms | 94ms | Noris Network |
| TCP Connection | 38ms | 46ms | Noris Network |
| TLS Handshake | 43ms | 52ms | Noris Network |
| Server Processing | 5531ms | 46ms | Pixel X |
| Total TTFB | 5666ms | 238ms | Pixel X |
Technology & Security Features
Noris Network
Pixel X
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.