NtiretyvsPair Networks
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Ntirety
View Details →
Pair Networks
View Details →Our Verdict
Pair Networks wins with 346ms TTFB (vs Ntirety's 3273ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Ntirety | Pair Networks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 319ms | 128ms | Pair Networks |
| TCP Connection | 279ms | 16ms | Pair Networks |
| TLS Handshake | 212ms | 20ms | Pair Networks |
| Server Processing | 639ms | 606ms | Pair Networks |
| Total TTFB | 1449ms | 770ms | Pair Networks |
Technology & Security Features
Ntirety
Pair Networks
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.