GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

USNtiretyvsWeb.comUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Ntirety
WPTR Score1785 ms
Rank#760
TTFB3273ms
Time to 1MB140ms
Score1785
LCP3673ms
FCP3473ms
Web.com
WPTR ScoreWinner419 ms
Rank#103
TTFB247ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score419
LCP647ms
FCP447ms

Our Verdict

Web.com wins with 247ms TTFB (vs Ntirety's 3273ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNtiretyWeb.comWinner
DNS Lookup319ms33msWeb.com
TCP Connection279ms8msWeb.com
TLS Handshake212ms10msWeb.com
Server Processing639ms90msWeb.com
Total TTFB1449ms141msWeb.com

Technology & Security Features

Ntirety

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size89.3 KB

Web.com

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size249.6 KB
1/3
Ntirety Security Features
2/3
Web.com Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.