GitHub|Since 2007

FRo2switchvsTelelecFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score925 ms
Rank#171
TTFB355ms
Time to 1MB162ms
Score925
LCP755ms
FCP555ms
WPTR ScoreWinner909 ms
Rank#122
TTFB314ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score909
LCP714ms
FCP514ms

Our Verdict

Telelec wins with 314ms TTFB (vs o2switch's 355ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phaseo2switchTelelecWinner
DNS Lookup244ms282mso2switch
TCP Connection120ms122mso2switch
TLS Handshake60ms81mso2switch
Server Processing112ms141mso2switch
Total TTFB536ms626msTelelec

Technology & Security Features

o2switch

Server/CDNo2switch
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size342.5 KB

Telelec

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size123.7 KB
1/3
o2switch Security Features
1/3
Telelec Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.