GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FROpenhostvsOxevaFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Openhost
WPTR Score2150 ms
Rank#491
TTFB271ms
Time to 1MB623ms
Score2150
LCP671ms
FCP471ms
Oxeva
WPTR ScoreWinner1144 ms
Rank#239
TTFB367ms
Time to 1MB229ms
Score1144
LCP767ms
FCP567ms

Our Verdict

Openhost wins with 271ms TTFB (vs Oxeva's 367ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseOpenhostOxevaWinner
DNS Lookup371ms219msOxeva
TCP Connection105ms274msOpenhost
TLS Handshake107ms51msOxeva
Server Processing72ms50msOxeva
Total TTFB655ms594msOpenhost

Technology & Security Features

Openhost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size121.8 KB

Oxeva

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size55.5 KB
2/3
Openhost Security Features
1/3
Oxeva Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.