GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FROxevavsScalingoFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Oxeva
WPTR ScoreWinner1144 ms
Rank#239
TTFB367ms
Time to 1MB229ms
Score1144
LCP767ms
FCP567ms
Scalingo
WPTR Score1400 ms
Rank#399
TTFB227ms
Time to 1MB486ms
Score1400
LCP627ms
FCP427ms

Our Verdict

Scalingo wins with 227ms TTFB (vs Oxeva's 367ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseOxevaScalingoWinner
DNS Lookup219ms63msScalingo
TCP Connection274ms55msScalingo
TLS Handshake51ms54msOxeva
Server Processing50ms62msOxeva
Total TTFB594ms234msScalingo

Technology & Security Features

Oxeva

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size55.5 KB

Scalingo

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size370.8 KB
1/3
Oxeva Security Features
1/3
Scalingo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.