GitHub|Since 2007

USPhoenixNAPvsWeb.comUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1527 ms
Rank#268
TTFB242ms
Time to 1MB298ms
Score1527
LCP642ms
FCP442ms
WPTR ScoreWinner419 ms
Rank#103
TTFB247ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score419
LCP647ms
FCP447ms

Our Verdict

PhoenixNAP wins with 242ms TTFB (vs Web.com's 247ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePhoenixNAPWeb.comWinner
DNS Lookup34ms33msWeb.com
TCP Connection17ms8msWeb.com
TLS Handshake21ms10msWeb.com
Server Processing740ms90msWeb.com
Total TTFB812ms141msPhoenixNAP

Technology & Security Features

PhoenixNAP

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size876.7 KB

Web.com

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size249.6 KB
3/3
PhoenixNAP Security Features
2/3
Web.com Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.