GitHub|Since 2007

DEProfihostvswebhostoneDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1091 ms
Rank#288
TTFB293ms
Time to 1MB291ms
Score1091
LCP693ms
FCP493ms
WPTR Score1175 ms
Rank#278
TTFB462ms
Time to 1MB214ms
Score1175
LCP862ms
FCP662ms

Our Verdict

Profihost wins with 293ms TTFB (vs webhostone's 462ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseProfihostwebhostoneWinner
DNS Lookup132ms247msProfihost
TCP Connection57ms265msProfihost
TLS Handshake60ms52mswebhostone
Server Processing144ms97mswebhostone
Total TTFB393ms661msProfihost

Technology & Security Features

Profihost

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size268.8 KB

webhostone

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size626.1 KB
1/3
Profihost Security Features
1/3
webhostone Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.