GitHub|Since 2007

FRProginovvsScalewayFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score3501 ms
Rank#672
TTFB2034ms
Time to 1MB264ms
Score3501
LCP2434ms
FCP2234ms
WPTR ScoreWinner370 ms
Rank#56
TTFB162ms
Time to 1MB112ms
Score370
LCP562ms
FCP362ms

Our Verdict

Scaleway wins with 162ms TTFB (vs Proginov's 2034ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseProginovScalewayWinner
DNS Lookup2406ms1msScaleway
TCP Connection303ms13msScaleway
TLS Handshake63ms17msScaleway
Server Processing95ms70msScaleway
Total TTFB2867ms101msScaleway

Technology & Security Features

Proginov

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size37.6 KB

Scaleway

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size286.6 KB
0/3
Proginov Security Features
3/3
Scaleway Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.