ProginovvsScaleway
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Proginov
View Details →
Scaleway
View Details →Our Verdict
Scaleway wins with 162ms TTFB (vs Proginov's 2034ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Proginov | Scaleway | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 2406ms | 1ms | Scaleway |
| TCP Connection | 303ms | 13ms | Scaleway |
| TLS Handshake | 63ms | 17ms | Scaleway |
| Server Processing | 95ms | 70ms | Scaleway |
| Total TTFB | 2867ms | 101ms | Scaleway |
Technology & Security Features
Proginov
Scaleway
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.