RackNerdvsAutomattic (WordPress.com)
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

RackNerd
View Details →
Automattic (WordPress.com)
View Details →Our Verdict
Automattic (WordPress.com) wins with 204ms TTFB (vs RackNerd's 252ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | RackNerd | Automattic (WordPress.com) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 35ms | 4ms | Automattic (WordPress.com) |
| TCP Connection | 14ms | 32ms | RackNerd |
| TLS Handshake | 17ms | 32ms | RackNerd |
| Server Processing | 219ms | 136ms | Automattic (WordPress.com) |
| Total TTFB | 285ms | 204ms | Automattic (WordPress.com) |
Technology & Security Features
RackNerd
Automattic (WordPress.com)
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.