Rad Web HostingvsSectorlink
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Rad Web Hosting
View Details →
Sectorlink
View Details →Our Verdict
Rad Web Hosting wins with 695ms TTFB (vs Sectorlink's 828ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Rad Web Hosting | Sectorlink | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 301ms | 17ms | Sectorlink |
| TCP Connection | 269ms | 132ms | Sectorlink |
| TLS Handshake | 151ms | 135ms | Sectorlink |
| Server Processing | 383ms | 150ms | Sectorlink |
| Total TTFB | 1104ms | 434ms | Rad Web Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
Rad Web Hosting
Sectorlink
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.