GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruRUVDSvsSmartaperu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

RUVDS
WPTR Score2721 ms
Rank#707
TTFB550ms
Time to 1MB1008ms
Score2721
LCP950ms
FCP750ms
Smartape
WPTR ScoreWinner1148 ms
Rank#421
TTFB895ms
Time to 1MB209ms
Score1148
LCP1295ms
FCP1095ms

Our Verdict

RUVDS wins with 550ms TTFB (vs Smartape's 895ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseRUVDSSmartapeWinner
DNS Lookup4ms142msRUVDS
TCP Connection76ms46msSmartape
TLS Handshake84ms48msSmartape
Server Processing138ms410msRUVDS
Total TTFB302ms646msRUVDS

Technology & Security Features

RUVDS

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size331.8 KB

Smartape

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size98.7 KB
1/3
RUVDS Security Features
1/3
Smartape Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.