GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DETimme HostingvsZAP-HostingDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Timme Hosting

Timme Hosting

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner965 ms
Rank#252
TTFB224ms
Time to 1MB295ms
Score965
LCP624ms
FCP424ms
ZAP-Hosting

ZAP-Hosting

View Details →
WPTR Score1567 ms
Rank#398
TTFB648ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1567
LCP1048ms
FCP848ms

Our Verdict

Timme Hosting wins with 224ms TTFB (vs ZAP-Hosting's 648ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseTimme HostingZAP-HostingWinner
DNS Lookup43ms1msZAP-Hosting
TCP Connection54ms11msZAP-Hosting
TLS Handshake57ms15msZAP-Hosting
Server Processing103ms882msTimme Hosting
Total TTFB257ms909msTimme Hosting

Technology & Security Features

Timme Hosting

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size90.0 KB

ZAP-Hosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size126.7 KB
2/3
Timme Hosting Security Features
2/3
ZAP-Hosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.