GitHub|Since 2007

DEWindcloudvsWP-SpaceDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1118 ms
Rank#273
TTFB260ms
Time to 1MB294ms
Score1118
LCP660ms
FCP460ms
WPTR ScoreWinner859 ms
Rank#193
TTFB240ms
Time to 1MB229ms
Score859
LCP640ms
FCP440ms

Our Verdict

WP-Space wins with 240ms TTFB (vs Windcloud's 260ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseWindcloudWP-SpaceWinner
DNS Lookup133ms26msWP-Space
TCP Connection119ms57msWP-Space
TLS Handshake62ms56msWP-Space
Server Processing98ms170msWindcloud
Total TTFB412ms309msWP-Space

Technology & Security Features

Windcloud

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size30.1 KB

WP-Space

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1036.5 KB
0/3
Windcloud Security Features
1/3
WP-Space Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.