GitHub|Since 2007

USAmazon Web Services (AWS)vsHTS (Hosting Telesystems)ru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner1201 ms
Rank#368
TTFB920ms
Time to 1MB117ms
Score1201
LCP1320ms
FCP1120ms
HTS (Hosting Telesystems)

HTS (Hosting Telesystems)

View Details
WPTR Score3539 ms
Rank#739
TTFB1588ms
Time to 1MB813ms
Score3539
LCP1988ms
FCP1788ms

Our Verdict

Amazon Web Services (AWS) wins with 920ms TTFB (vs HTS (Hosting Telesystems)'s 1588ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.