GitHub|Since 2007
WPTR

USHorizoniqvsZAP-HostingDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/10/2026

Horizoniq
WPTR ScoreWinner2345 ms
Rank#632
TTFB1896ms
Time to 1MB187ms
Score2345/100
LCP2296ms
FCP2096ms
ZAP-Hosting

ZAP-Hosting

View Details →
WPTR Score2430 ms
Rank#646
TTFB236ms
Time to 1MB914ms
Score2430/100
LCP636ms
FCP436ms

Our Verdict

ZAP-Hosting wins with 236ms TTFB (vs Horizoniq's 1896ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.